This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_ws_agreement_spec.referred_specs at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:15:58 GMT SourceForge : Post

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Project: Editor     Discussion > REC: WS-Agreement spec > Referred Specs > List of Posts
Forum Topic - Referred Specs: (2 Items)
View:  as 
 
 
Referred Specs
In the page 6 of WS-Agreement (2004-12-27) document, I found references to the specifications named "WS-Policy",  "WS-
Federation", "WS-Cooperation" and "WS-ReliableMessaging."  Those specs have not yet been submitted
to any standardization body. It is not desirable to refer to such
proprietary specifications in this WSA document, which is to be
standardized officially. 
I hope the WG revise the sentences and the table in page 6 by removing "WS-Policy", "WS-Federation", "WS-Cooperation" 
and replacing "WS-ReliableMessaging" with "WS-Reliability" instead.
From the comments-list on Actions etc
We need to be explict about the state of the specs. that we refer to,including their version.  Be clear where these are 
public but not ratified by any standards body.  Update table on page 6 (section1.1.1).  Remove the MAY be composed 
entries.  Add column where we areexplict about version that will be used.  (Revisit this at beginning of next week).
28th Feb. Not used the spec., but followed the model is another category as in the case of WS-Policy. 
 **Action: use table provided by Toshi in e-mail of 2/28/05 to replace the current table on page 6.

 
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_ws_agreement_spec.referred_specs at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:15:59 GMT