This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_jsdl_spec_v1_0.comments_on_spec_1_0draft_v21 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:14:47 GMT SourceForge : Post

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Project: Editor     Discussion > REC: JSDL Spec v1.0 > Comments on spec 1.0draft-v21 > List of Posts
Forum Topic - Comments on spec 1.0draft-v21: (2 Items)
View:  as 
 
 
Comments on spec 1.0draft-v21
Originating Comments from Ian Stokes-Rees of Particle Physics, Oxford

-------------------------

Three small comments on the spec:

1. in Sec 6.4.3.1, it is not clear if "may" or "must" should be used. The example further confuses me.

2. in Sec 6.5.3.1, it refers to the WorkingDirectory element. Is it correct to refer to an extension explicitly in the 
base specification?

3. Appendix 2 is missing quotes around some of the attributes on the <schema> element.

Cheers,

Ian
Re: Comments on spec 1.0draft-v21
These will be fixed in the final draft. Thanks.

 
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_jsdl_spec_v1_0.comments_on_spec_1_0draft_v21 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:14:48 GMT