This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_drmaa_api_spec_1_0_full_rec.topc4130 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:23:41 GMT SourceForge : Post

Project Home

Tracker

Documents

Tasks

Source Code

Discussions

File Releases

Wiki

Project Admin
Project: Editor     Discussion > REC:DRMAA API Spec 1.0 Full Rec > DRMAA Feedback > List of Posts
Forum Topic - DRMAA Feedback: (2 Items)
View:  as 
 
 
DRMAA Feedback
I think I missed the deadline for public comments, but anyway, I want to express
my support for the publication of the DRMAA specification as a full OGF
standard.  

The SAGA group relies heavily of both the DRMAA specification effort and on the
experiences of the DRMAA community and implementations in respect to high level
Grid APIs.  We are actually citing a number of concepts and paradigms from the
DRMAA spec in the SAGA Core API specification.  In that context, the DRMAA
approaches are suitable for our specific set of use cases, and provided valuable
guidelines for our own job submission and management API.

Well, SAGA is not an implementation of DRMAA, so that all may not be of much
interest to DRMAA implementors and users -- anyway, we feel that the success of
the DRMAA paradigms are worth mentioning.

Andre Merzky, Co-Chair of the SAGA Core Working Group.

Re: DRMAA Feedback
Thank you Andre!

It will not be far into future when we will look into SAGA implementations work, DRM systems advances, and the end user 
feedback to start doing the next DRMAA specification iteration.

 
 


The Open Grid Forum Contact Webmaster | Report a problem | GridForge Help
This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum GridForge content management system saved from host forge.ogf.org file /sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/discussion.rec_drmaa_api_spec_1_0_full_rec.topc4130 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:23:42 GMT