- The language designed in this document seems very similar to Smart Frog 
Language itself. At least, my understanding is that its syntax is almost 
the same. It is desired that the document describes explicitly what was 
improved, in the design of the language, based on Smart Frog Language.

- The last paragraph in Chapter 2 says that the language specification does 
not describe the binding of the language to any system that supports language.
If so, the binding of the language to CDDLM framework must be defined 
somewhere. Will it be defined in the component model specification, or in 
basic services specification ?

- Some of the indents of the lines of the language description examples are
  inappropriate.
    - p.12 foo2, foo3, foo4 attribute
    - p.13 foo2, foo3, foo4 attribute
    - p.23 throw2 attribute
    - p.35 line 100-107 of the sample

- In Section 20.4, TestSourceDatabase component should be derived from 
Database component.

- In Section 20.3.3, DataFeed component, which is a worklet, should be 
derived from Worklet component. If the derivation is optional, the description
should be like resultAnalyzer in Section 20.5.2.

--
ASCADE
Yuichiro Yonebayashi