Here are my comments on the draft. 

Section 1.3 - In types of grids discussion, 'Collaboration Grids' is in bold, other types are not. Make this consistent.


Section 2 - the last sentence of the OGF goal definition says "... build real operation grids using OGF-defined 
components.". I believe this should say 'standards' rather than 'components'. Component to me implies an implementation,
 a standard should allow for multiple implementations.

Section 4.1.3 - first sentence should read "... PERMIS [5], and XACML." rather than "... PERMIS [5], XACML."

Section 5 - In the 'Current Status' discussion I suggest this be modified to follow the the same 3-tier recommendation 
convention as defined GFD.1. The current wording implies that having reference implementations and interop test preceeds
 a Proposed Recommendation, while GFD.1 says this is required to transition from Proposed to Draft Recommendation. So 
the steps might be recast as: Concept, WrkGrp, WG-Draft, Proposed-Std, Draft-Std, Grid-Std, Product, Deploy.

Table 3 - under Web services security the 'OGSA-SBP' specs should be 'OGSA-BSP' specs. Also, both of these have now 
achieved Proposed Recommendation status.

Table 4 - under security, web service protocol security, change 'OGSA Secure Channel" to "OGSA-BSP specs". Both of the 
BSP specs are applicable.

Regards,
Blair Dillaway