SourceForge : Post

Project: Editor Discussion > INFO: PGM-Workshop Proceedings > I recommend publication after minor edits > List of Posts

Forum Topic - I recommend publication after minor edits: (2 Items)

View: as

Update

Thilo Kielmann

10/03/2004 10:12 AM

post4487

I recommend publication after minor edits

This reports contains useful information to the Grid community.
I recommend its publication. However, I recommend one careful editing pass before doing so. (E.g., affiliation "NASSA" 
for the editor ;-)

The abstract should mention that only REFERENCES to the slides are included. If possible, the individual abstracts could
 be polished to avoid future tense and possibly (as with grid2003) be more specific now that the talks had been given.

Most importantly, I would love Section 3 to be more explicit with prsenting the most important findings. Could you 
please, e.g., have a concluding paragraph that summarizes what you had learned from the workshop and what are the 
directions to go from here?

Craig Lee

10/04/2004 8:12 PM

post4488

I concur

I concur w/ Thilo's comments.   As with most workshop reports,
the real value is in the analysis and identification of emerging
themes across the papers presented.  Another further material
or analysis of the discussion in Section 3 would be good.  Even so,
the section does point out areas for further work, e.g., robustness,
debugging tools, grid shells, frameworks, etc.

WRT minor typos like "NASSA", hopefully the GGF Editor will
catch them.  Also, the paper links all point to GridForge so they
should at least be stable.

Return