Draft Agenda for F2F meeting:

* High-level design issues
    - clarify what we already agree on
    - issue: complexity of what rep-property applies when they can be on type, scope, local, default, etc.
        - note: IBM suggestion: no rep annotations on simple type definitions

* Transforms - how to specify them, and what their properties/parameters are.
    - (we need a new name different from 'transforms' I think - mikeb)
    - black-box external transforms
    - internally specified "in DFDL" transforms
    - everyone's dissatisfied with these examples in Jim's latest set, so far.

* OMG Type Descriptor Model - review its capabilities
    - consider relative to prior rep-properties proposals?

* Complexity Limits - review some "hard" examples where we don't have constructs yet to handle them.
    - do we want/need to cover these examples.

That's enough agenda to fill the 2 days. We'll also allow ourselves some flexibility to re-prioritize.